[screen 1]
Hybrid threats are complex, adaptive, and multi-domain. Can they be defended against?
Yes - but defense requires moving beyond traditional security approaches. Effective defense demands resilience across society, coordination across government, and active participation by citizens.
This module presents a comprehensive defense framework.
[screen 2]
The Resilience Paradigm
Traditional security focused on deterrence and defense at borders. Hybrid threats operate inside societies, exploiting internal vulnerabilities.
This requires shifting from purely defensive postures to building societal resilience - the ability to withstand, adapt to, and recover from hybrid operations while maintaining democratic values and social cohesion.
[screen 3]
Four Pillars of Resilience
Awareness: Understanding the threats and how they operate
Resistance: Reducing vulnerabilities that adversaries exploit
Recovery: Quickly restoring normal function after attacks
Adaptation: Learning from attacks to strengthen future defense
Each pillar requires coordinated action across government, private sector, and civil society.
[screen 4]
Multi-Domain Defense
Because hybrid threats operate across domains, defense must too:
Information domain: Counter-narratives, media literacy, platform resilience
Cyber domain: Critical infrastructure protection, rapid attribution
Economic domain: Supply chain resilience, sanctions coordination
Political domain: Election security, foreign influence transparency
Social domain: Community cohesion, trust in institutions
No single domain defense suffices - integration is essential.
[screen 5]
Early Warning and Attribution
Effective response requires early detection. This demands:
- Intelligence fusion: Combining signals from multiple sources and domains
- Horizon scanning: Monitoring for indicators of preparation
- Pattern recognition: Identifying coordinated campaigns early
- Rapid attribution: Determining adversary identity quickly enough to enable response
Many democracies have improved these capabilities since 2016, but gaps remain.
[screen 6]
Institutional Coordination
Hybrid threats don’t respect organizational boundaries. Defense requires coordination:
- Horizontal: Across government departments (foreign affairs, defense, intelligence, law enforcement, communications)
- Vertical: Between national, regional, and local levels
- External: With private sector (especially tech platforms) and civil society
Some countries have created specific coordination bodies like Resilience Councils to achieve this.
[screen 7]
International Cooperation
Hybrid threat actors often operate across borders. Effective defense requires:
- Intelligence sharing: Coordinating threat information among allies
- Attribution coordination: Joint statements increase credibility and reduce isolation
- Response coordination: Synchronized actions (sanctions, expulsions, cyber responses)
- Capability building: Helping vulnerable allies strengthen defenses
NATO, EU, and other alliances have enhanced hybrid threat cooperation frameworks.
[screen 8]
The Information Battlefield
Since information manipulation is central to hybrid threats, information defense is critical:
Pre-bunking: Inoculating populations against manipulation before it occurs
Rapid response: Quickly countering false narratives with facts
Strategic communication: Proactive messaging that advances democratic values
Media literacy: Educating citizens to critically evaluate information
Platform accountability: Requiring tech companies to address manipulation on their services
[screen 9]
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Hybrid operations often target infrastructure. Protection requires:
- Identifying critical systems and dependencies
- Reducing digital attack surfaces
- Building redundancy and backup systems
- Practicing crisis response scenarios
- Coordinating with infrastructure operators (often private companies)
Both physical and digital infrastructure need attention.
[screen 10]
Democratic Values as Strength
Some advocate restricting freedoms to defend against hybrid threats. This is counterproductive - it achieves adversary objectives.
Instead, democratic values can be strengths:
Transparency: Open societies better detect foreign manipulation
Free press: Independent media investigates and exposes operations
Civil society: NGOs and activists provide early warning
Rule of law: Legal frameworks enable measured, legitimate responses
The challenge is defending these values, not abandoning them.
[screen 11]
Whole-of-Society Approach
Governments alone cannot defend against hybrid threats. Everyone has a role:
Citizens: Critical thinking, reporting suspicious activity, social cohesion
Media: Fact-checking, investigative journalism, responsible reporting
Tech companies: Platform security, content moderation, transparency
Academia: Research, education, expertise
Private sector: Infrastructure security, supply chain resilience
When society acts together, resilience multiplies.
[screen 12]
Your Role in Defense
As an individual, you contribute to hybrid threat defense by:
- Staying informed about threats without panic
- Practicing media literacy and critical thinking
- Not amplifying suspicious content
- Supporting quality journalism
- Reporting suspicious activity to authorities
- Building community connections that resist manipulation
- Voting and participating in democratic processes
- Supporting evidence-based policy responses
Personal resilience creates societal resilience.
[screen 13]
Looking Forward
Hybrid threats will evolve as adversaries adapt and technologies change. Defense must evolve too.
Priority areas for development:
- AI-enabled detection and response systems
- Faster attribution capabilities
- Enhanced public-private coordination
- Improved media literacy at scale
- Resilience metrics and assessment
- International legal frameworks for gray zone operations
Continued investment in resilience and coordination is essential.