[screen 1]
The European Union faces sophisticated foreign information manipulation targeting its institutions, member states, and citizens. How is Europe responding?
The EU approach combines detection systems, platform regulation, strategic communication, and resilience building - a multi-layered defense reflecting the complex nature of FIMI threats.
[screen 2]
The Evolution of EU Response
EU FIMI defense evolved through stages:
2015-2017: Initial awareness after Ukraine crisis and elections
2018-2019: Creation of detection systems (EUvsDisinfo, RAN)
2020-2021: COVID-19 infodemic accelerates platform regulation efforts
2022-2023: Digital Services Act and strengthened Code of Practice
2024-2026: Implementation and refinement of comprehensive framework
Response has moved from reactive detection to proactive resilience-building.
[screen 3]
EUvsDisinfo and Detection
The East StratCom Task Force (now part of EEAS Strategic Communication Division) created EUvsDisinfo in 2015.
Function:
- Monitoring and documenting pro-Kremlin disinformation
- Database of disinformation cases
- Weekly reports and analysis
- Public exposure of narratives and tactics
Impact:
- Over 15,000 documented cases
- Increased awareness among media and public
- Evidence base for policy responses
Limitations: Focus on Russian sources; reactive rather than preventive; exposure doesn’t eliminate operations
[screen 4]
The Rapid Alert System (RAS)
Launched 2019, RAS enables real-time information sharing:
Members: EU institutions, member states, G7 partners
Function:
- Early warning about foreign interference
- Coordinated detection and response
- Information sharing about campaigns
- Preparation for elections and sensitive periods
Successes: Coordinated responses to interference attempts during European Parliament elections and national elections
Challenge: Speed of information sharing vs verification requirements
[screen 5]
Platform Regulation: Digital Services Act
The Digital Services Act (DSA), fully implemented 2024, represents comprehensive platform regulation:
Key provisions for FIMI defense:
- Transparency in content moderation decisions
- Risk assessments for disinformation
- Independent audits of very large platforms
- Researcher data access
- Crisis response mechanisms
- Coordinated enforcement across member states
DSA shifts responsibility from voluntary cooperation to legal obligations.
[screen 6]
Code of Practice on Disinformation
Strengthened in 2022, the Code of Practice on Disinformation commits platforms to:
- Transparency: Ad libraries, amplification algorithms disclosed
- Integrity: Policies against fake accounts and bot manipulation
- Empowerment: Tools for users to report and understand content
- Monitoring: Regular reports and independent evaluation
- Research access: Enabling independent scrutiny
Unlike earlier voluntary code, strengthened version has monitoring and accountability mechanisms.
[screen 7]
European External Action Service (EEAS)
EEAS leads EU’s diplomatic response to FIMI:
Strategic Communication Division:
- Coordinating messaging across EU institutions
- Supporting member states
- Monitoring foreign information manipulation
- Attribution and public exposure
Hybrid Fusion Cell:
- Analysis of hybrid threats including information manipulation
- Early warning and situational awareness
- Supporting member state responses
EEAS provides coordination that no single member state could achieve alone.
[screen 8]
Election Protection
EU has developed specific election protection measures:
European Cooperation Network on Elections (2021):
- Information sharing during election periods
- Best practices for election security
- Coordinated platform monitoring
Election guidance for member states:
- Cybersecurity standards
- Disinformation monitoring
- Fact-checking support
- Media literacy campaigns
Elections remain national, but coordination strengthens resilience.
[screen 9]
Member State Responses
Individual member states implement varied approaches:
France: VIGINUM (disinformation detection agency), election integrity measures
Germany: Federal Office for Information Security, media literacy programs
Finland: Comprehensive societal resilience approach, education integration
Baltic states: Enhanced monitoring due to proximity to Russia
Nordic countries: Cross-border cooperation, early warning systems
Diversity reflects different threat perceptions and political contexts.
[screen 10]
Strategic Communication
EU’s positive communication strategy:
- Promoting European values and achievements
- Countering false narratives with facts
- Engaging with target audiences directly
- Supporting independent media in neighborhood
- Multilingual outreach
Goal: Fill information space with credible content, not just debunk false claims. Proactive rather than purely reactive.
[screen 11]
Civil Society and Research Role
EU supports independent FIMI research and monitoring:
Funding: Research programs, NGO support
Access: Platform data access for researchers (DSA requirement)
Networks: EDMO (European Digital Media Observatory) coordinates fact-checkers and researchers
Collaboration: Regular dialogue between researchers, platforms, and policymakers
Civil society provides independent monitoring that governments alone cannot.
[screen 12]
Media Literacy Initiatives
Building societal resilience through education:
- Media literacy in school curricula (varies by member state)
- Public awareness campaigns
- Training for journalists and educators
- Toolkit development and sharing
- Research on effective interventions
Recognition: Long-term resilience requires educated, critical citizens. Technical defenses alone insufficient.
[screen 13]
International Cooperation
EU coordinates with allies beyond Europe:
NATO: Hybrid threat monitoring, information sharing
G7: Rapid Response Mechanism for foreign interference
Bilateral: Cooperation with US, UK, Canada, Australia
Multilateral: UNESCO, OECD initiatives
FIMI operations cross borders; effective defense requires international coordination.
[screen 14]
Legal and Diplomatic Tools
EU employs various response mechanisms:
Sanctions: Targeting individuals and entities involved in disinformation
Diplomatic attribution: Public statements naming responsible actors
Demarches: Formal diplomatic protests
Restrictive measures: Against state media outlets spreading manipulation
Legal action: Enforcing DSA and other regulations
These tools impose costs on actors conducting FIMI operations.
[screen 15]
Challenges and Limitations
Despite progress, significant challenges remain:
- Coordination: 27 member states with different priorities
- Speed: Democratic processes slower than adversary adaptation
- Resources: Asymmetry between defense costs and attack costs
- Legal limits: Free speech protections constrain responses
- Attribution: Continued difficulty definitively identifying actors
- Effectiveness measurement: Unclear if defenses adequately deter operations
- Platform cooperation: Varies by company and region
[screen 16]
Balancing Security and Rights
EU approach must navigate tensions:
Content regulation vs free expression
Platform oversight vs innovation
Security vs privacy
Proactive defense vs reactive transparency
Getting this balance right is essential - defeating FIMI while abandoning European values would be a form of defeat.
[screen 17]
Future Directions
EU FIMI defense continues evolving:
- Enhanced AI detection capabilities
- Faster response mechanisms
- Improved researcher access to data
- Strengthened media literacy at scale
- Better attribution capabilities
- Increased platform accountability enforcement
- Expanded international cooperation
- Resilience metrics and assessment
The threat will persist and evolve; defense must too.
[screen 18]
SAUFEX Project Context
The SAUFEX project exemplifies EU’s research-driven approach:
Focus: Understanding FIMI tactics, developing detection methods, strengthening resilience
Consortium: Research institutions across multiple member states
Products: Training programs (like this course), detection tools, policy recommendations
Approach: Combining technical innovation with social science understanding
Projects like SAUFEX translate research into practical defense capabilities.
[screen 19]
Your Role in EU Defense
As a European citizen or resident, you contribute by:
- Staying informed about FIMI threats
- Practicing critical evaluation of information
- Supporting quality journalism
- Participating in democratic processes
- Not amplifying suspicious content
- Reporting manipulation when detected
- Engaging with accurate counter-narratives
- Supporting evidence-based policy responses
EU defense isn’t just institutional - it requires engaged, aware citizens. Individual actions create collective resilience.