← Back to Insights

Module: FIMI Case Studies

By SAUFEX Consortium 23 January 2026

[screen 1]

Abstract concepts become concrete through specific examples. This module examines well-documented FIMI operations to illustrate tactics, impacts, and lessons learned.

These aren’t hypothetical threats - they’re documented operations that targeted democratic societies, with real consequences.

[screen 2]

Case Study 1: 2016 US Election

Perhaps the most studied FIMI operation, Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election demonstrated sophisticated multi-platform coordination.

Actors: Internet Research Agency (IRA), GRU military intelligence

Tactics:

  • Fake social media personas (both left and right-wing)
  • Targeted ads to swing state voters
  • Organization of real-world events
  • Hack-and-leak operations (DNC emails)
  • Amplification of divisive content

Impact: Millions of engagements, mainstream media coverage of leaked materials, potential influence on close election

Lessons: Multi-platform coordination, long-term planning (IRA accounts built over years), exploiting existing polarization

[screen 3]

Case Study 2: Brexit Referendum

The 2016 UK referendum on EU membership involved multiple foreign influence operations.

Documented activities:

  • Russian accounts amplifying both Leave and Remain to increase division
  • Targeting Scottish independence narratives
  • Amplifying anti-immigrant sentiment
  • Creating appearance of organic grassroots movements

Unique factors:

  • Short campaign period limited detection
  • Less robust platform monitoring than in US
  • Intersecting with domestic disinformation

Lessons: FIMI doesn’t necessarily support one side - sowing division can be the objective itself

[screen 4]

Russian FIMI operations regarding Ukraine demonstrate sustained, multi-year campaigns.

2014-2022: Pre-invasion

  • “Ukraine is failed state” narratives
  • Amplifying corruption allegations
  • “Nazi” and “fascist” labeling of Ukrainian government
  • Questioning Ukrainian national identity
  • MH17 disinformation (multiple contradictory explanations)

2022-present: During invasion

  • False flag narratives (claiming Ukraine attacked itself)
  • Denial of war crimes despite evidence
  • Justification narratives
  • Anti-NATO messaging to European audiences
  • Targeting Western support and resolve

Lessons: Long-term narrative preparation before kinetic operations, integration of information warfare with military action

[screen 5]

Case Study 4: COVID-19 Infodemic

The pandemic became a massive FIMI opportunity for multiple actors.

Russian operations:

  • Amplifying anti-vaccine content
  • Promoting conspiracy theories
  • Discrediting Western vaccines while promoting Sputnik V
  • Amplifying pandemic denialism

Chinese operations:

  • Defending regime’s pandemic response
  • Spreading theories about US origins of virus
  • Amplifying criticism of Western pandemic management

Iranian operations:

  • Anti-Western pandemic narratives
  • Bioweapon conspiracy theories

Lessons: Crises create information chaos that FIMI operations exploit; public health becomes information battleground

[screen 6]

Case Study 5: French Presidential Elections (2017)

Russian-linked operations targeting Emmanuel Macron’s campaign demonstrated sophisticated tactics.

Operation:

  • Macron campaign hack and leak days before election
  • False narratives about Macron’s personal life
  • Amplification through US alt-right networks before spreading to France
  • Timed for maximum impact with minimum response time

Response:

  • French media maintained blackout period despite leaks
  • Campaign had prepared by providing false documents among real ones
  • Swift attribution and exposure

Lessons: Pre-bunking and preparation can limit impact; election integrity requires defending information space

[screen 7]

Case Study 6: German Elections (2017)

Multiple operations targeted German federal elections, though with more limited success than in other countries.

Attempts:

  • Lisa case (false story about refugee sexual assault)
  • Anti-refugee disinformation
  • Support for AfD (far-right party)
  • Hack-and-leak attempts

Why limited success:

  • Strong German media literacy
  • Robust fact-checking
  • Language barrier (Russian operators less fluent in German)
  • Platform and government coordination
  • Public awareness after 2016 US/UK experiences

Lessons: Preparedness and resilience reduce FIMI effectiveness; not all operations succeed

[screen 8]

Case Study 7: Catalonia Independence Referendum (2017)

Russian accounts amplified tensions around Catalonia’s independence referendum in Spain.

Activities:

  • Amplifying both separatist and unionist content to increase conflict
  • Creating appearance of international support for independence
  • Amplifying violent imagery from police response
  • Parallel to strategy in Ukraine (supporting separatism in adversary states)

Lessons: Regional separatist movements within EU are FIMI targets; the goal is often destabilization rather than specific outcome

[screen 9]

Case Study 8: “Operation Secondary Infektion”

A long-running Russian operation discovered in 2019 demonstrated sophisticated forgery and amplification.

Tactics:

  • Creating fake documents appearing to be from US, UK, and other sources
  • Publishing on blogs and forums
  • Attempting to get mainstream media to report

Notable forgeries:

  • Fake Integrity Initiative documents
  • False NATO documents
  • Fabricated intelligence reports

Why interesting: Operation ran for years with limited success - most forgeries were ignored or quickly debunked

Lessons: Quantity doesn’t ensure quality; sophisticated operations can still fail when targeting aware audiences

[screen 10]

Case Study 9: COVID Lab Leak Narrative

The laboratory origin theory for COVID-19 demonstrates the complexity of FIMI around uncertain issues.

Timeline:

  • Early 2020: Natural origin consensus among scientists
  • Chinese dismissal of any origin investigation
  • Russian and Chinese amplification of bioweapon theories
  • 2021: Lab leak hypothesis gains some scientific credibility
  • Ongoing: Mix of legitimate scientific debate and FIMI operations

Challenges:

  • Distinguishing legitimate questions from disinformation
  • Foreign actors amplifying genuine scientific uncertainty
  • Politicization of scientific questions

Lessons: FIMI is most effective when exploiting genuine uncertainty; line between foreign manipulation and legitimate debate can blur

[screen 11]

Case Study 10: Operation Doppelgänger

An ongoing (as of 2024-2026) operation creating fake versions of legitimate media websites.

Method:

  • Creating fake websites mimicking legitimate news outlets
  • Publishing false articles on these sites
  • Sharing via social media to create confusion
  • Some articles mix real reporting with inserted false claims

Targets: German, French, and other European media outlets

Detection: Researchers and platforms identified network through coordination patterns

Lessons: Attribution and exposure reduce but don’t eliminate operations; actors continue operating even after exposure

[screen 12]

Common Patterns Across Cases

Several themes emerge from documented operations:

  • Multi-platform coordination: Successful operations rarely stay on one platform
  • Long-term investment: Most sophisticated operations involve years of preparation
  • Exploitation of real tensions: FIMI amplifies existing divisions rather than creating new ones
  • Adaptation: Actors learn from failures and platform countermeasures
  • Persistence: Exposure doesn’t end operations; actors regenerate and continue
  • Increasing sophistication: Tactics evolve toward more believable, harder-to-detect methods

[screen 13]

The Attribution Challenge

Many cases demonstrate attribution difficulties:

  • Actors use proxies and cutouts
  • Technical evidence (IP addresses, etc.) can be spoofed
  • Determining state direction vs independent actors is difficult
  • Political implications of attribution require high confidence

Later module covers attribution in detail, but these cases show why it’s challenging.

[screen 14]

Impact Assessment Challenges

Determining actual impact of FIMI operations is difficult:

  • Correlation doesn’t prove causation (would Brexit/Trump have happened without FIMI?)
  • Measuring attitude change is complex
  • Separating foreign from domestic manipulation
  • Accounting for organic spread after initial seeding

These cases affected public discourse, but quantifying electoral or policy impact remains contentious.

[screen 15]

Lessons for Defense

These cases inform defense strategies:

Prevention:

  • Awareness and media literacy reduce vulnerability
  • Platform policies and enforcement matter
  • International coordination enables swift response

Detection:

  • Pattern recognition across platforms
  • Linguistic and behavioral analysis
  • Researcher and civil society monitoring

Response:

  • Swift public attribution
  • Platform removal of inauthentic networks
  • Fact-checking and debunking
  • Supporting quality journalism

Resilience:

  • Societal cohesion reduces exploitation opportunities
  • Trust in institutions matters
  • Education builds long-term resilience

Each case provides lessons that strengthen collective defense against future operations.