(40) Why Youth Resilience Councils are essential to Resilience Councils

By Onno Hansen-Staszyński | Last Updated: 1 April 2025

What are the unique contributions Youth Resilience Councils (YRCs) can bring to Resilience Councils (RCs) in terms of enhancing the effectiveness, legitimacy, and long-term resilience of the broader FIMI response strategy?

Closing the generational vulnerability gap

Argument: Adolescents and young adults are prime targets of FIMI campaigns, yet they are often absent from decision-making.

• Why it matters:

o Adolescents spend more time in digital environments than any other demographic.

o They are disproportionately exposed to disinformation, algorithm-driven radicalization, and social pressure dynamics.

o Without their input, RCs risk missing key insights on how FIMI actually affects digital-native generations.

• What YRCs add:

o Provide direct, experience-based insights into how disinformation spreads within youth networks.

o Identify new, youth-specific manipulation tactics that older experts might overlook.

o Help adapt RC recommendations to real-world digital behaviors.

Strengthening societal resilience by reducing dislocation

Argument: Adolescents experience “partial dislocation” (isolation from public life), which increases their vulnerability to FIMI. YRCs counteract this.

• Why it matters:

o Many young people withdraw into small, trusted “islands” (peer groups, online spaces) and avoid broader engagement.

o Dislocation weakens resilience, making youth more susceptible to polarization, echo chambers, and extremist narratives.

o If we don’t connect young people to real democratic decision-making, FIMI actors will fill that gap.

• What YRCs add:

o They offer structured participation in national resilience strategies, reducing feelings of detachment.

o They ensure that youth develop critical thinking and agency in public discourse.

o They bridge the gap between their personal experiences and national policymaking.

Enhancing the legitimacy of RC decisions

Argument: For RCs to be broadly accepted, their decisions must reflect society as a whole—including youth perspectives.

• Why it matters:

o Youth make up a large and increasingly vocal part of society—but their views are often sidelined.

o Policies crafted without youth input risk facing pushback, disengagement, or even rejection by younger generations.

o Disinformation actors often exploit youth distrust in institutions to spread anti-democratic narratives.

• What YRCs add:

o Their presence signals inclusivity, ensuring RC recommendations resonate across generations.

o They increase public trust in RC outcomes, making policies harder to dismiss as “out of touch.”

o They provide peer-to-peer influence—youth are more likely to trust messages when they come from other youth.

Future-proofing dealing with FIMI

Argument: FIMI threats evolve rapidly, and the most effective long-term strategy is ensuring that future generations are equipped to counter them.

• Why it matters:

o Long-term resilience requires building a generation that instinctively recognizes and resists FIMI tactics.

o Many countries in the EU implement educational responses to disinformation—but resilience must extend beyond media literacy to active civic participation.

• What YRCs add:

o Create a pipeline of engaged, critical citizens who will lead future resilience efforts.

o Ensure that counter-FIMI strategies are not just top-down but organically embedded in youth culture.

o Provide a feedback loop—as FIMI tactics evolve, new youth participants continue updating RC strategies.

Operational benefits: youth as early warning sensors

Argument: YRCs act as real-time monitoring networks, detecting emerging FIMI trends faster than traditional RC structures.

• Why it matters:

o Many FIMI narratives spread first in youth spaces (TikTok, Discord, gaming platforms) before reaching mainstream media.

o Traditional RC structures may not catch these threats until they are already widespread.

o Youth are more adaptable to digital shifts than many policy experts.

• What YRCs add:

o Act as early warning systems, flagging new threats before they escalate.

o Offer real-time feedback on the effectiveness of RC strategies in countering youth-targeted FIMI.

o Help tailor interventions for maximum impact in digital-native communities.

Subscribe now &
Get the latest updates

Quick Reference

Stabłowicka 147 Street

54-066 Wrocław

Poland

Alexanderveld 5

2516 BE The Hague

Netherlands

funded by the EU

European Union does not accept liability for any damages resulting from visiting the website,
using the services or software it contains, using the information ...

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material on this website in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. 

Learn how SAUFEX collects, uses, and protects your personal data. This policy explains our use of cookies, data sharing practices, user rights under GDPR, and the measures we take to ensure data security. Stay informed about how your data is managed and your options for control Click here